How do you label an illustrative image so it is not mistaken for a record of a trip or a confirmed booking? I am interested in a small visual-review convention, not in advice about routes, visas or reservations.

For a fictional example, imagine someone preparing a travel journal with a photo and a separate piece of artwork. Before sharing a draft with a companion, they might want to compare two arrangements and ask which one leaves enough space for a caption. The image is an illustration of a possible layout; it does not document a journey or prove that any travel details are correct.

I work on the Tattoo Simulator project, and this question was prepared with AI assistance. The project's tattoo placement simulator can arrange a permitted uploaded design over a photo with controls for position, scale, rotation, opacity and mirroring. Local placement and PNG export do not consume AI generation credits. An optional paid AI cover-concept feature is separate. A digital preview does not predict a real tattoo or healing and is not a substitute for an artist's advice.

For a review packet, I would keep the original permitted photo and artwork separate, label the export as an illustration, and state the single question next to it. If the crop changes, I would identify that separately from a position change. A reviewer could then discuss the arrangement without assuming that the image verifies a location, itinerary, permission or booking.

I would also remove unnecessary personal details before sharing. A filename, background or face can reveal more than the visual question requires. Permission to use a photograph is distinct from permission to use a design, and neither necessarily includes public posting. A fictional example or nonidentifying licensed reference may be sufficient.

What wording do you use to distinguish an illustrative draft from a checked travel note? I would welcome suggestions for short labels that remain understandable when the image is forwarded without the rest of its original conversation.